Proposal

Still some way to go with mobilities, but I sense I got somewhere. So back to the dilemma: identities - articulation- positionings - alterities - hierarchical systems of difference - subalternity - marginality - the trajectory from which positioning emerges. I've been stuck with probably the first line of my proposal: "The research examines three major theoretical issues: 1) the way systems of difference create and even constitute social inequalities by defining “normal citizens” and the “others”; 2) how places are the concrete sphere in which social tensions are produced and negotiated; and 3) how spatial mobility challenges state discipline and social control."

Maybe:
1) What if I dont look at the systems so much? I know we've been examining the conformation of the grids and the making of trajectories circulating the grids (geaprona), so it was not just about how to locate people in the grid but how both were produced. Massumi then is not totaly "discovering" sth none , but still we have a point it would be trajectories that lead to subject positions and the re-creation of the grid -the matrix-, but how see this trajectories? "other" forms of politics?
2) mmm probably i should say: how are places produced (lefebvre) as unstable detentions of movement, the location of temporary an "accidental" encounters, that produce an "through-together-ness", contemporaneous coexistence of difference (massey)
3) how is movement unfold, is there transformation during the translations inbetween places? what does happen to people when - while they move? what effects do trips have in the configurations of space? in which way are movements part of the spatiality of capitalism and how much do they exceed the capitals flow (people, money, commodities)?